Started By
Message

re: Thousands of Flint residents refuse to pay for poison water; could lose homes.

Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:40 am to
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22072 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:40 am to
quote:

the state should be intervening if the city has been unable to resolve this problem


The state intervened and caused this problem. The state has been thus far unable to fix the problem they caused.
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
16922 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 11:02 am to
quote:

state intervened and caused this problem.


The problem was the use of water from the Flint River, which was a city/county plan dating back to 2007. They could have reconnected to the original Lake Huron source (which is where Detroit gets their water), but declined. This is on the city of Flint for making poor decisions. It's on the state for failing to clean up their river. It's on Flint's former manufacturing giants that used to line the river for damaging the water quality to begin with.

Having known how bad the water quality was, the city should have never even planned to use the Flint River as a source. I suppose the state should have prevented such lunacy before it even started somehow.

The Flint River is so corrosive that almost immediately after it became the primary source of water, a General Motors truck plant had to find an alternate source. The water was corroding equipment and piping in their factory. That's how bad it was.
This post was edited on 5/4/17 at 11:05 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram