Started By
Message

re: Rush on pre-existing ...it's not insurance, it's welfare

Posted on 2/27/20 at 9:16 am to
Posted by CaTiger85
Member since Feb 2020
1394 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 9:16 am to
quote:

You may argue that allowing a new insured in a group policy impacts the group negatively when the new insured is already receiving ongoing treatment. But that statement does not take into account the positive effect on the group when an existing insured who receives ongoing treatment leaves the group. If these two common events are considered under actuarial analysis, it's a wash


Yikes. You clearly don’t understand actuarials. Your bloviating doesn’t change the fact it is a math game. Numbers don’t lie.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23920 posts
Posted on 2/27/20 at 9:18 am to
quote:

You clearly don’t understand actuarials.


Hep me to your wisdom. And to make this fun, I won't tell you what I've been doing professionally for about 35 years. Now go ahead and explain it to me.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram