Started By
Message

re: One of the best takes on today's ESPN layoffs

Posted on 4/26/17 at 6:30 pm to
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
26841 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

ESPN has been hemorrhaging subscribers for some time now as a result of cord-cutting, which hurts them much more than other networks given that they charge vastly higher carriage fees.


I didnt cut the cord b/c of ESPN. I did b/c of the 200 other channels. If ESPN offered a base package for streaming, and added packages for something like the sec, or big 10 or acc, I'd subscribe to that.
And if a cable company would offer just a sports package that would be locals, ESPN, fox sports, NBC, the nfl/nba/mlb/golf channels, Turner sports, I'd subscribe to that.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111704 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

I didnt cut the cord b/c of ESPN. I did b/c of the 200 other channels. If ESPN offered a base package for streaming, and added packages for something like the sec, or big 10 or acc, I'd subscribe to that.
And if a cable company would offer just a sports package that would be locals, ESPN, fox sports, NBC, the nfl/nba/mlb/golf channels, Turner sports, I'd subscribe to that.
Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but why wouldn't they offer a standalone produce for ESPN? Is it as simple as they cable companies have it in their contract that ESPN can't do that?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram