- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The surprise Princeton document : constitution convention rejected judicial veto power
Posted on 4/25/17 at 5:37 pm to MintBerry Crunch
Posted on 4/25/17 at 5:37 pm to MintBerry Crunch
quote:
The constitution itself.
I'd love to have it explained to me how the constitution itself is going to explain what is reasonable and unreasonable is when there are no words doing so.
Example 4th Amendment:
quote:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures
This post was edited on 4/25/17 at 5:38 pm
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News