Started By
Message

re: Stephen King's IT....(Update) I take back what I said, book is fantastic

Posted on 4/21/17 at 8:23 am to
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53789 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 8:23 am to
quote:


I'm just losing focus when King uses two pages/3-4 paragraphs to basically say, "the house is at the end of the street".

Descriptive flow is essential, but it just appears overly congested at times.


I tried to read the Dark Tower, and got about 100 pages in and had to stop. It was ridiculous in the description. I know i should power through it and it's a good book, but i just couldn't do it.

FWIW, i read an interview by King and he even admitted his earlier books are hard to get through. He says, himself, that he regrets that writing style because he was trying too hard to impress or show off his literary knowledge, when he should have just focused on the story and got to the point.

I'm not opposed to reading through detail, after all, i'm huge on Clancy, and that dude can go into detail for 5 pages on missile aviation mechanics, just to tell you a missile exploded.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
73214 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 8:44 am to
quote:

I'm not opposed to reading through detail, after all, i'm huge on Clancy, and that dude can go into detail for 5 pages on missile aviation mechanics, just to tell you a missile exploded.
Same here. Crichton does the same thing when he would discuss a fairly complex biology or physics concept.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
67023 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

tried to read the Dark Tower, and got about 100 pages in and had to stop



What



In




The




Actual



frick
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram