- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Former intel officer confirms to CNN that US IC was using Brits to get around US law
Posted on 4/15/17 at 3:12 pm to jb4
Posted on 4/15/17 at 3:12 pm to jb4
quote:Well none of that gets to the question. I'm not interested in which candidates elements within the U.K. theoretically wanted to win. I'm interested in whether or not their agencies carried out activities inconsistent with their mission. There's currently no evidence suggesting they did.
You are clueless if you think the U.K. Govt was neutral in2016. Heck, they wanted Obama in 2012 over Romney, see the comments when Romney visited U.K. Summer of 2012. They wanted dirt on trump regardless of a Russian connection and turn that over to Obama admin to use, so they spied on him.
And FWIW, if I had to choose between worrying about which candidate the U.K. and the rest of the civilized world wanted and the candidate that Russia and other unsavory actors wanted, I know which would concern me more from a foreign policy and national security perspective.
This post was edited on 4/15/17 at 3:35 pm
3
Posted on 4/15/17 at 3:16 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Navytiger74
Your ability to avoid admitting your man Obama pulled another IRS targeting scandal on steroids is truly comical.
It is obvious you are realizing the truth of what Obama did and i think deep down, you recognize it was scummy.
But you'll die before admitting it on this board.
Posted on 4/15/17 at 3:22 pm to Navytiger74
Just look at the countries that align themselves with the parties. Democrats have England taking their side, one of the first democracies and strong ally in every war since world war 1. Republicans align themselves with a dictatorship that has been against the us in every war since world war 2. Just shows you where each parties priorities lie
Posted on 4/15/17 at 3:24 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Well none of that gets to the question. I'm not interested in who elements within the U.K. theoretically wanted to win. I'm interested in whether or not their agencies carried out activities inconsistent with their mission. There's currently no evidence suggesting they did.
Your conclusion is a fricking lie and you know it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News