- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anybody Here STILL BELIEVE That Trump's Surveillance Accusation Hasn't Been Proven?
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:15 pm to Iosh
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:15 pm to Iosh
quote:
Just curious. Do you still claim to be a libertarian who isn't particularly partisan?
I am thoroughly tired of the "let's classify Iosh's political beliefs" argument by now I can't imagine how you people aren't.
I'll put that down as a yes
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:15 pm to a want
quote:
Yeah...that in no way, shape or form validates Trump's claim.
Reports of Trump communications circulated throughout the NSA, WH, DoD, and DoJ for over a year which was before he was nominee or POTUS-Elect. I dont know what else you need for evidence.
The chick on MSNBC that caused a lot of the recent flack was an Obama staffer but the info she was talking about was during a time after she left the Obama admin and was working for the Clinton Campaign... WTF or HTF did she get that info?
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:17 pm to Iosh
quote:
I am thoroughly tired of the "let's classify Iosh's political beliefs" argument by now I can't imagine how you people aren't.
Good thing this was your response. Otherwise, the OP's proclivity for telling people what they believe and backing it up with made-up post history accusations would have taken hold of the conversation.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:22 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:
Good thing this was your response. Otherwise, the OP's proclivity for telling people what they believe and backing it up with made-up post history accusations would have taken hold of the conversation.
Now, now. No need to get NASTY.
I'm perfectly fine with losh pleading the 5th.
This post was edited on 4/3/17 at 5:24 pm
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:25 pm to Navytiger74
quote:quote:
All the usual suspects have checked in
Not yet.
And there are still a couple of others left.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:28 pm to KCT
quote:
Just curious. Do you still claim to be a libertarian who isn't particularly partisan?
That's what all the progs say on this board. It's like they're scared to stand for their conviction and beliefs.
OR
They voted for Trump!
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:30 pm to KCT
quote:
Anybody Here STILL BELIEVE That Trump's Surveillance Accusation Hasn't Been Proven
I haven't seen a video of Obama running the cables down Trump tower to his parked van on 5th avenue in Manhattan.
So no, I don't believe Trump's assertions.
This post was edited on 4/3/17 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:30 pm to KCT
I'll put you down on the list of "posters who exclusively reply to me with meta-posts instead of actual argument"
Which at this point is damn near all of you
Which at this point is damn near all of you
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:32 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
It's like they're scared to stand for their conviction and beliefs.
No, it's not like that at all.
Some of us simply don't rely on Tweets from Cheetos stained fingertips to get our views on everything.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:33 pm to GetmorewithLes
quote:
Reports of Trump communications circulated throughout the NSA, WH, DoD, and DoJ for over a year which was before he was nominee or POTUS-Elect. I dont know what else you need for evidence.
Let's Review:
quote:
Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!
He said that Obama was behind the "tapping" of Trump towers "just before the victory". Right?
If he had said his team was under investigation for possible collusion with Russia in the election hacking scandal: that's one thing. Because if there was any type of surveillance it was because of that. And I would completely believe that.
This post was edited on 4/3/17 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:34 pm to GetmorewithLes
quote:
WTF or HTF did she get that info?
And, why did she lie & plead total ignorance of any unmasking in March?
Note to a want. You need to do the following 3 things:
(1) Remove your head from Obama's arse.
(2) Wash your face.
(3) Catch up on what the rest of us have learned the past week.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:34 pm to Iosh
quote:I still love you, bro, in spite of the Snowden stuff. Otherwise you a good baw who wundo nuffin bad.
I'll put you down on the list of "posters who exclusively reply to me with meta-posts instead of actual argument" Which at this point is damn near all of you
#NoHomo.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:35 pm to VOLhalla
quote:
I don't know how a rational person can say that there's evidence to support the claim that Obama had Trump Tower wiretapped
=/=
quote:
even Nunes said all the intelligence was gathered legally
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:35 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Some of us simply don't rely on Tweets from Cheetos stained fingertips to get our views on everything.
Quit being a fricking pussy.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:36 pm to Iosh
quote:
I'll put you down on the list of "posters who exclusively reply to me with meta-posts instead of actual argument"
Which at this point is damn near all of you
Typical SJW.
You need me to send you a box of Kleenex? That's the best I can do. I don't have a pussy hat.
This post was edited on 4/3/17 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:40 pm to KCT
Trump's accusation was proof enough for me. I told y'all was going all in with Trump. I'm in deep, way up his arse. And it smells like winning in here.
As for as the surveillance, it happened. No one is denying that. Did they do it "legally?" frick if I know. But I do know that unmasking American names and releasing it to the media was rotten as frick and politically motivated. If you don't see that then you are as dumb as a bag of hammers.
As for as the surveillance, it happened. No one is denying that. Did they do it "legally?" frick if I know. But I do know that unmasking American names and releasing it to the media was rotten as frick and politically motivated. If you don't see that then you are as dumb as a bag of hammers.
This post was edited on 4/3/17 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 4/3/17 at 5:41 pm to KCT
I don't see how it has still seems like the crazy rambling of a coot nearing senility.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News