- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Out of the Box Healthcare Ideas
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:15 pm to Antonio Moss
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:15 pm to Antonio Moss
The IBFreeman Subscription Based plan for medicare and medicaid
Recipients would receive vouchers to subscribe to providers of primary care and catastrophic care. They would be free to shop among the providers that would have such plans---basically all of them would quickly move to this.
If in their shopping they find a plan less than the voucher they can keep the difference.
Why this works?
1) pre existing conditions are not nearly as big a deal if the providers is going to get paid monthly whether people are sick or not
2) hospitals have tremendous fixed cost and most would prefer this type of income stream
3) shopping becomes easier and instead of having one buyer--the government--we would have hundreds of millions and that will bring down cost as it would bring competition into play
4) subsidies would become easier to define. Democrats should like this--
5) the corruption of government direct buying of healthcare services would be over.
Recipients would receive vouchers to subscribe to providers of primary care and catastrophic care. They would be free to shop among the providers that would have such plans---basically all of them would quickly move to this.
If in their shopping they find a plan less than the voucher they can keep the difference.
Why this works?
1) pre existing conditions are not nearly as big a deal if the providers is going to get paid monthly whether people are sick or not
2) hospitals have tremendous fixed cost and most would prefer this type of income stream
3) shopping becomes easier and instead of having one buyer--the government--we would have hundreds of millions and that will bring down cost as it would bring competition into play
4) subsidies would become easier to define. Democrats should like this--
5) the corruption of government direct buying of healthcare services would be over.
This post was edited on 3/28/17 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:20 pm to I B Freeman
Hospitals want whatever gives them the most revenue.
You show me a hospital without a construction boom on the property and I'll show you a critical access hospital.
You show me a hospital without a construction boom on the property and I'll show you a critical access hospital.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:25 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
1) pre existing conditions are not nearly as big a deal if the providers is going to get paid monthly whether people are sick or not
LOL. You didn't think this through if you believe that.
No Doc is going to want someone on their roles that is already sick.
This post was edited on 3/28/17 at 1:29 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News