- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cops tase elderly man who said he can't get on the ground because he is disabled- He dies
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:19 pm to shel311
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:19 pm to shel311
quote:
It certainly gives context on why they came in like they did, but it doesn't change my opinion. It seems like when 1 cop was there before you, you should come in and follow his lead, not just come flying on and doing whatever you wanted to do, he obviously is going to have more info than her having been there with the dude for a minute or so. And unless I missed him having a weapon or reaching for one, he wasn't really a direct threat at that exact moment, they could have easily closed in on him and either taken him down with no weapon or shot him if he made a move, since they were ready for that. It's still gross to me, I can't see supporting her actions as having done no wrong.
Agree 100%. But they will support the thug cop
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:37 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
But they will support the thug cop
And you will always support the thug due to your pathological hatred of police.
Posted on 3/28/17 at 11:19 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Agree 100%. But they will support the thug cop
The reason for supporting a cop is often because they are either responding the way they were trained (an agency can be civilly liable without being criminally liable), or they perceive threats as a reasonable officer would.
If the female cop simply acted as she was trained, she is neither criminally or civilly liable, though the agency can be civilly liable.
There are training issues captured in this video that will be used to improve officer responses:
*Male officer should have seen what appears to be a chair behind the male subject. He could have directed the female to search the chair for weapons and then directed the subject to have a seat. He could have then been cuffed to the chair while they searched him for weapons and continue to assess the environment.
*Male officer should have advised the female that the subject reported to be disabled. Since he looks like Santa Claus, this was plausible information.
In my opinion, mistakes appear to have been made, but the actions of the officer may not be criminal if they acted as they were trained.
This post was edited on 3/28/17 at 11:28 am
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News