Started By
Message

re: Tying run on second and no outs

Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:34 pm to
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Let me see if I have this straight. We are ranked 4th in the nation and loss a 1 run game to fla and you want to fire the coach?


No, but we sure can come to the rant and RANT about how fricking stupid he seems to be at times with the simplest of decisions.

On the road, great pitcher having your kids stumped, miracle play in right to give you a shot at winning, man on second with no outs and no bunt? WTF? On top of that, you give a green light on a 3-1 pitch and let your kid swing at a pitch that probably would have sent their starter to the bench (1st and 2nd w no outs). No pinch hitters hitting over .200?

Do anything! Something!
This post was edited on 3/25/17 at 2:08 pm
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
15211 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:36 pm to
I'm more pissed that it should have been 1st and 2nd with only one out - slaughter clearly was walked. You could tell CPM wanted to let the ump have it and I wouldn't have blamed him.
Posted by tjtiger9
MS
Member since Aug 2005
3878 posts
Posted on 3/26/17 at 12:05 am to
Are you always such a douche? Just crawl back into your troll land and shut up.
Posted by tjtiger9
MS
Member since Aug 2005
3878 posts
Posted on 3/26/17 at 12:06 am to
While I agree that the called third strike was horrible, that was on Slaughter with the swing at ball 4 in his eyes.
Posted by Chaseff
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2011
1165 posts
Posted on 3/26/17 at 1:25 am to
It didn't matter that he didn't bunt. The next two hitter struck out. They wouldn't have gotten him in anyway.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram