quote:
Even "IF" Russia unilaterally interfered, Putin's only interest was keeping HRC, who was hellbent on war with his country, from being able to wage war on his country.

Do you honestly believe she was "hellbent" on war with Russia? Her campaign rhetoric was a shrewd calculated move to blunt repub criticism of her time as SOS. She was the leading politicrat for the man who infamously derided his opponent for claiming Russia to be a national security threat "the 80's want their foriegn policy back". She famously handed the Russian ambassador a stage prop red button with a mistranslated "reset" written on it. Russia then went on to invade two countries.

She began acting tough for political expediency only and Russia knew this. They no more feared HRC than they did toothless Berry.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by berrycajun

Baton Rouge

Member since May 2016

6913 posts

Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:28 am to McChowder

it's not about her. She represented the one world order. War is what they do. Soros propaganda is used in the target country to convince the people that their leader is bad. A faction of the people become revels. The Rebels are given weapons by the one world order. War starts and a puppet leader put in place while children and guns and drugs are trafficked and the resources of the land stolen. Divide and conquer is what they do and Russia was likely next on their list. Putin is in their way.

I wouldn't be surprised is they gave guns to all the puss hat wearing raging liberals here in America. What they did in the other nations is what they are doing here- convince the people their leader is bad in an effort to overthrow.

1 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board