Started By
Message

re: NY Senator believes gun "silencers" completely silence a shot

Posted on 3/20/17 at 12:37 pm to
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
18426 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

So they don't have to wear plugs and muffs? The frickin horror.

For the record, this point sounds kind of dickish. Why do people by rolexes? A timex tells the time just the same. Why do people buy white gold instead of traditional gold? It's preference. If a suppressor serves the same purpose as ear plugs, like you're implying, what's the problem with making the process to get them easier?
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

For the record, this point sounds kind of dickish.


As intended because he responded to simple, innocent questions with aggression. I reciprocated

quote:

Why do people by rolexes? A timex tells the time just the same. Why do people buy white gold instead of traditional gold? It's preference. If a suppressor serves the same purpose as ear plugs, like you're implying, what's the problem with making the process to get them easier?


I am not against suppressors being easier to get.

But compared something you put on a gun to make it quieter is clearly something that has a little more significance than someone spending money on a watch.

My point was, if the argument is simply that they don't want to wear ear plugs, that is ineffective on a national stage when discussing something as controversial as firearms. The recoil argument is far, far better IMO.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram