- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Police are under no obligation to protect you from harm
Posted on 3/20/17 at 11:38 am to weagle99
Posted on 3/20/17 at 11:38 am to weagle99
Do I really have to go through each one? Crap. Ok. I'm headed to lunch. Check back in a couple of hours.
For he D.C. Case...one distinguishable as the officer never witnessed the crime. 2. Not applicable in California as it is the D.C. Court of Apprals and not the SCOTUS.
I'll go through the rest in a bit.
For he D.C. Case...one distinguishable as the officer never witnessed the crime. 2. Not applicable in California as it is the D.C. Court of Apprals and not the SCOTUS.
I'll go through the rest in a bit.
This post was edited on 3/20/17 at 11:42 am
1
Posted on 3/20/17 at 11:53 am to BBONDS25
Don't feel obligated, but I am open to learning if my premise is incorrect. Police not protecting individuals is a major topic of conversation in the self defense community.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News