- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Police are under no obligation to protect you from harm
Posted on 3/20/17 at 10:42 am to weagle99
Posted on 3/20/17 at 10:42 am to weagle99
I can't believe this slapfight has gone on for 4 pages because two sides can't agree that the premise matters.
Cops have no obligation to follow you around (or even be in your neighborhood) and protect you from harm if and when it happens.
They absolutely DO have an obligation to step in if assault happens right in front of them, and to deal with the attacker (which, by default, should result in "protection" for the victim).
How is this not clear?
Cops have no obligation to follow you around (or even be in your neighborhood) and protect you from harm if and when it happens.
They absolutely DO have an obligation to step in if assault happens right in front of them, and to deal with the attacker (which, by default, should result in "protection" for the victim).
How is this not clear?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)