- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let's talk about military spending
Posted on 3/17/17 at 1:15 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Posted on 3/17/17 at 1:15 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Force projection is the Navy's thing man. They're the best in the world at it and it's pretty much their mission in life.
I was talking more in the realm of the Strategic Airlift capability. But I'm going to guess your response will be "Navy can do it."
I mean basically what you're advocating is that the Air Force just gets re-flagged as the Navy.
quote:
Meh. We can obviously keep some guys on as full timers to maintain the knowledge base as a cadre. Under my plan the guard would be a lot better funded than they are now.
The issue isn't funding, the issue is PERSTEMPO. Unless you mean massively expanding the AGR positions. Us M-Day folks have full time jobs, and any more of a increase in PERSTEMPO would put our jobs at risk.
quote:
The Navy or perhaps even create a new branch all together to conduct this mission. It's not unprecedented. We created a whole new branch the last time a brand new facet of warfare was developed with the Air Force. Although arguable that never should've happened.
Not the Navy. You guys suck at cyber I will say an entire new branch is probably necessary. I've still got quite a few friends and colleagues on the active side in various cyber units, and one and all they say "Big Army/Navy/AirForce/etc" is killing their ability to keep technical skills up and be flexible.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 1:17 pm to Centinel
The Navy is great at everything except ship commanders not getting fired
Posted on 3/17/17 at 1:20 pm to Centinel
quote:Air national guard dude.
was talking more in the realm of the Strategic Airlift capability. But I'm going to guess your response will be "Navy can do it."
quote:More of both really. Increase the number of required drill periods from two days per month to three or four. Increase the AT period from 2 weeks to 3 or 4. That's all negotiable.
The issue isn't funding, the issue is PERSTEMPO. Unless you mean massively expanding the AGR positions. Us M-Day folks have full time jobs, and any more of a increase in PERSTEMPO would put our jobs at risk.
quote:Im not married to any idea really. The IC can continue do it for all I care.
Not the Navy. You guys suck at cyber I will say an entire new branch is probably necessary. I've still got quite a few friends and colleagues on the active side in various cyber units, and one and all they say "Big Army/Navy/AirForce/etc" is killing their ability to keep technical skills up and be flexible.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News