- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let's talk about military spending
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:39 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:39 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
I think there's definitely room to reduce the size of both, but outright elimination? No.
1. Who handles the nukes?
2. Force Projection would go to shite. That's not something you can just ramp up. Not in this day and age.
3. The loss of knowledge at the tactical and strategic level. Again, not something you can just ramp up in this day and age. And not something the National Guard can effectively maintain. It's a full time job.
4. What about the cyber mission force?
That's just off the top of my head.
1. Who handles the nukes?
2. Force Projection would go to shite. That's not something you can just ramp up. Not in this day and age.
3. The loss of knowledge at the tactical and strategic level. Again, not something you can just ramp up in this day and age. And not something the National Guard can effectively maintain. It's a full time job.
4. What about the cyber mission force?
That's just off the top of my head.
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:52 pm to Centinel
quote:The Navy
1. Who handles the nukes?
quote:Force projection is the Navy's thing man. They're the best in the world at it and it's pretty much their mission in life.
2. Force Projection would go to shite. That's not something you can just ramp up. Not in this day and age.
quote:Meh. We can obviously keep some guys on as full timers to maintain the knowledge base as a cadre. Under my plan the guard would be a lot better funded than they are now.
3. The loss of knowledge at the tactical and strategic level. Again, not something you can just ramp up in this day and age. And not something the National Guard can effectively maintain. It's a full time job.
quote:The Navy or perhaps even create a new branch all together to conduct this mission. It's not unprecedented. We created a whole new branch the last time a brand new facet of warfare was developed with the Air Force. Although arguable that never should've happened.
4. What about the cyber mission force?
Posted on 3/17/17 at 1:21 pm to Centinel
quote:The Navy can do all that.
I think there's definitely room to reduce the size of both, but outright elimination? No.
1. Who handles the nukes?
2. Force Projection would go to shite. That's not something you can just ramp up. Not in this day and age.
3. The loss of knowledge at the tactical and strategic level. Again, not something you can just ramp up in this day and age. And not something the National Guard can effectively maintain. It's a full time job.
4. What about the cyber mission force?
That's just off the top of my head.
Sit down.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News