Started By
Message

re: Louisiana's 'Blue Lives Matter Bill' Under Attack

Posted on 3/16/17 at 8:56 am to
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
39994 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Someone who kills another person based solely on their classification (black, white, man, woman, police officer, catholic, Muslim, etc) is a threat to that entire group of people, therefore the public needs far more protection from that person.

bullshite. The public needs to be protected from anyone who kills someone. Period. We don't need to reinvent the wheel and pretend that killing someone of a certain profession or race or sexual orientation is worse or more injurious to the public that killing a random joe who isn't gay, black or a cop.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30678 posts
Posted on 3/16/17 at 9:13 am to
quote:

bullshite. The public needs to be protected from anyone who kills someone. Period. We don't need to reinvent the wheel and pretend that killing someone of a certain profession or race or sexual orientation is worse or more injurious to the public that killing a random joe who isn't gay, black or a cop.

You don't understand the concept. The intent of a murder is important. The intent gives you an idea of the mental state of a person and their likelihood to kill again. Compare a person who kidnaps a random woman that he does not know and kills her with a man that kills his wife for filing divorce papers. Both are wrong, and both get murder charges. But is the man that kills his wife as dangerous to the public as the man that kills for no reason? That's the intent of my definition of hate crime laws. It's a distinction that allows us to put dangerous people away for longer
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram