Started By
Message

re: Scott Pruitt says carbon dioxide is not a primary contributor to global warming

Posted on 3/9/17 at 2:27 pm to
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

A few inconvenient questions that man-made climate change advocates can't answer.
Back in the old Medieval days wine grapes grew very well in England. Since it's too cold to grow them today, the logical conclusion is that it was warmer then.
1) What were the Romans, Gaules, Angles, Norse, etc doing to pump all that CO2 into the atmosphere?
Then it suddenly got colder, a lot colder! So cold in fact that smart scientist often refer to this period as the Little Ice Age.
2) What did humans do to cause this?! Did we stop exhaling CO2?
3) Why do these scientists never just propose what ever we did then, we do now?
1) They weren't, it was the sun.
2) They didn't, it was the sun.
3) It's not the sun this time.

I dunno these seemed pretty convenient.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

3) It's not the sun this time.


What it are you talking about? .8 of (1) degree in 100 years and you're comparing that to natural changes over much longer periods of time? Thats not even a rounding error.
The small up tick in temps could be reasonably attributed to natural cycles and a small effect of cleaner air standards removing particulate matter allowing more sunlight and heat to reach the Earth...oddly that tracks the clean air regs time frame...I'm sure it's just a coincidence.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram