Started By
Message

re: Watched the OJ 30 for 30: Can anyone possibly believe he didn't do it after that

Posted on 2/23/17 at 11:28 am to
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139889 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 11:28 am to
There is evidence in the blood evidence. The blood evidence is unreliable though as it was mixed with all of the people at the scene. There is also evidence by OJ saying I couldn't do this myself. There's been statements also by Jason that seem cryptic. I am in no way, shape, or form saying OJ is innocent, I just do not believe it was just him. There was someone else involved.



ETA: The dumbest theory out there was the drug angle. The people who use that theory are really reaching.
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 11:31 am
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35939 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

The dumbest theory out there was the drug angle. The people who use that theory are really reaching.

Colombian neck tie?
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158835 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 1:19 pm to
OJ was all about OJ, if he could have thrown his son under the bus to maintain his image he would have.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram