Started By
Message

re: Watched the OJ 30 for 30: Can anyone possibly believe he didn't do it after that

Posted on 2/23/17 at 9:04 am to
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 9:04 am to
quote:

It's amazing that espn is going to win a Oscar in a year that espn has received nothing but criticism on here, much deserved in many cases.



8,760 hours in a year.

They got 8 of em right.

ETA:

Maybe 11 if you count the Espy's in a non-Bruce Jenner getting awarded for chopping his dick off year.

This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 9:05 am
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18554 posts
Posted on 2/23/17 at 9:23 am to
He was found "not guilty" because of the mysterious blood spot on the gate that was found days later, the glove not fitting, and the detective pleading the fifth when asked if he planted evidence.

It was enough "reasonable doubt", I guess. But OJ definitely did it and the jury made up their minds on day 1 that they were gonna let him off the hook.

And how the F is it legal for a defense team to enter a defendant's home and re-organize everything to paint a favorable picture of their client to a jury? That garbage had me rolling my eyes. Also, F all of them for turning it into a race case. I know they had to "do what they had to do" but that was nauseating.
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 9:25 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram