re: Tigerdroppings as a whole is not that conservative of a website

quote:

---

except when there are facts proving something. Since when is Religion something that can't be debated? Science is something that can be tested, not debated. That was my point

---

You obviously do not know your scientific history. Science can absolutely be debated, and scientific FACTS can actually change. I would encourage you to look into the caloric theory and how it was published in pretty much every scientific text book until late in the 19th century.

For debates in scientific literature I would instruct you to look at the evidence for both sides of the asphaltine structure debates (eventually proven one way versus the other) and then at string theory versus the quantum model versus a holographic universe. There are A LOT of things science doesn't know, and when it comes to that there are debates.

Climate science has become an orthodox religion to many in the field (see the Ga Tech prof who recently retired and her reasons). Most would agree that it is happening, but the degree to which anthropogenic CO2 is accelerating things is still very much in debate.