Started By
Message

re: Warren now disallowed from participating in Sessions' discussions

Posted on 2/8/17 at 9:06 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124410 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 9:06 am to
quote:

The funny part is the letter will now probably be read by a lot more people than it would have had they just let her read it. I've already seen a handful of people on Facebook this morning sharing it.
Well, this is an instance where there is no "funny part". I see absolutely nothing in Sessions record that would indicate he is/was a bigot/racist/prejudiced or anything else. As I am with John Lewis, I am deferent to Mrs.King and the things she went through. But that does not entitle her to her own facts. Unfortunately she probably got talked into 'adjusting' her account by Ted Kennedy. It was very much the "Bork" model concoction smear. If the MSM were interested in the truth, Warren would not even have cause to even read those 30 yr-old statements because in doing so she'd be shamed off the floor. But the MSM is not interested in truth.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25320 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 9:08 am to
Didn't we all assume Warren had reservations about Sessions?
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32129 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 9:55 am to
quote:

I see absolutely nothing in Sessions record that would indicate he is/was a bigot/racist/prejudiced or anything else.


Well he's a republican and a white male. That's all Democrats need to call someone racist.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram