- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BREAKING: DHS suspends implementation of travel ban
Posted on 2/4/17 at 11:37 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/4/17 at 11:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
no but objective rules are needed when we're talking about potential legal policy, especially when that policy threatens to dissolve liberty and/or property (and esp when due process is pretty discarded)
Luckily, we have the Constitution and over 200 years of legal precedent to guide us in the matter.
quote:
you're picking a definition you want to avoid discussing your values
I'm not, you're attempting to substitute a definition that I'm not using to make a point that you couldn't otherwise make.
3
Posted on 2/4/17 at 12:19 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Your word, which you used at the very beginning. My point, which remains in response to your first word, which you have still not rebutted in any way whatsoever.
I'm not, you're attempting to substitute a definition that I'm not using to make a point that you couldn't otherwise make.
Anyone who cares to read the thread can and will see this.
You are worse than dishonest, you are phony.
Enough with you.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 12:26 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Luckily, we have the Constitution and over 200 years of legal precedent to guide us in the matter.
when courts rely on your "rules", we get the situation i describe (often using the 14A, which you celebrated earlier)
Posted on 2/4/17 at 3:16 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Luckily, we have the Constitution and over 200 years of legal precedent to guide us in the matter.
So. With that being said. Will someone on this board PLEASE provide an unbiased and logical explanation as to where in the Constitution does it say, "these rights pertain to all individuals of the world"?
I thought the Constitution protects the rights of the "American citizen", as well as providing power where and when power is needed to the entities protecting us.
This post was edited on 2/4/17 at 3:19 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News