Started By
Message

re: 401K v. Real Estate

Posted on 1/28/17 at 8:50 am to
Posted by I Love Bama
Alabama
Member since Nov 2007
37740 posts
Posted on 1/28/17 at 8:50 am to
The correct answer is to have both.

What if you are getting rent and property value increases at 3% a year as well? What if the market tanks and your property is worth 50%?

There is no right answer. You should strive for diversified investments and multiple income streams.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73298 posts
Posted on 1/28/17 at 11:00 am to
quote:

You should strive for diversified investments and multiple income streams.




and RE provides numerous tax advantages, depreciation, equity capture, principal paydown AND CASH FLOW!

It takes alot more money to make money in dividend paying stocks/funds than in RE but I do like both. Multiple income streams. Got tired of the lending, Looking for other things now.

How i only wish tax liens and commodity/futures trading was a passive/semi passive investment!
This post was edited on 1/28/17 at 7:27 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram