quote:
Therefore, it is possible that there were actually more people who came to DC to witness Trump's inauguration in person than who witnessed each of Obama's inaugurations in person but they were blocked by disrupters from doing that.

quote:
This is alternative fact. The DC Metro stats would tell us if you were correct here. You, as usual, are wrong.

No they wouldn't, The DC Metro stats merely tell us how many more people used the DC Metro to get to each of Obama's inaugurations than used the DC Metro to get to Trump's inauguration.

The fact that Washington DC is overwhelmingly black and they voted overwhelmingly for Obama suggests more local black people would go to each of Obama's inaugurations than would go to Trump's inauguration. Most of those local blacks would use the DC Metro to get to each of Obama's inaugurations while a lot less local blacks would go to Trump's inauguration so a lot less local blacks would use the DC Metro to get to Trump's inauguration.

Did DC Metro do a survey to count how many of the people were black who used the DC Metro to get to each of Obama's inaugurations compared to the number of blacks who used the DC Metro to get to Trump's inauguration?

What about all the white people who don't live in DC who went to Trump's inauguration who got hotel and motel rooms near the inauguration who didn't need to use the DC Metro to get to Trump's inauguration?

Was a survey done to determine the number of white people who went to Trump's inauguration who didn't use the DC Metro?

Was a survey done to determine how many blacks went to each of Obama's inaugurations compared to the number of blacks who went to Trump's inauguration?

Was a survey done to determine how many whites went to each of Obama's inaugurations compared to the number of whites who went to Trump's inauguration?

When you get those figures then get back to me and we can discuss what those figures suggest.