Started By
Message

re: Which would you rather?

Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:49 pm to
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30174 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:49 pm to
The goal should be always improvement and playoffs. We decided to forego money and picks for vets which is doubling down and failing.

For every asik deal we made it in costed us at least an additional 10mil. The money we spent on him plus the money we spent on a player of need we didn't draft.

The draft is such a crapshoot, especially after your top choices are off the board. Even then it's hard to say if a guy will be guaranteed or not. Even this year's rookies were considered elite potential (Brown and Ingram), but they just look bad. Vastly different than guys like Parker and Wiggins for sure.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:51 pm to
not sure what you're trying to say-

Demps is foolish for ignoring the draft, but high draft picks aren't that great b/c two highly thought of rookies pegged as long term projects look like...long term projects 3 months into their careers?

from what i've seen (admittedly not a ton) of either guy this season, i'd be ecstatic if the Pels had Ingram or Brown, warts and all
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram