- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NYT shits all over Buzzfeed & Pissgate media
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:19 am to udtiger
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:19 am to udtiger
quote:Reporting that Teump was briefed on a given topic by the IC isn't second-hand heresay. And if, in the by and by, you heard something like that about me, I'd hope you'd contact the FBI so that it could be investigated and adjudicated. We have too many holes in our intelligence services as it is.
So, just cracking the lid on Pandora's Box (actually, Jar) is okay, but throwing off the cover is not (even though lifting the lid would undoubtedly lead to the cover being tossed aside)?
That's like I hear secondhand hearsay, completely unsubstantiated and unverifiable, about you that you take bribes from Chinese spies in exchange for military secrets. I just report that there's information out there that could affect your security clearance, but say nothing about the "details." There's no legitimate argument I can make that would support the notion that my "report" would not lead to the underlying allegations seeing the light of day.
4
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:29 am to Navytiger74
quote:
if, in the by and by, you heard something like that about me, I'd hope you'd contact the FBI so that it could be investigated and adjudicated. We have too many holes in our intelligence services as it is.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:48 am to Navytiger74
quote:
reporting that Teump was briefed on a given topic by the IC isn't second-hand heresay
MSNBC just said he was not briefed on this?!?
This post was edited on 1/11/17 at 8:49 am
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:59 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Reporting that Teump was briefed on a given topic by the IC isn't second-hand heresay. And if, in the by and by, you heard something like that about me, I'd hope you'd contact the FBI so that it could be investigated and adjudicated. We have too many holes in our intelligence services as it is.
Apparently it is 2nd hand heresay as it is now being reported that their was no briefing (which was the air-cover making it a "story" to some).
And sure, "I want you to contact the FBI", bullshite. No one in their right mind wants the FBI, CIA, IRS, anyone, snooping around anything. Thats how you get focked.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:59 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Reporting that Teump was briefed on a given topic by the IC isn't second-hand heresay.
Correct, but reporting on the hearsay that was supposedly presented by the IC is third-hand hearsay (news agency heard it from IC who heard it from someone else who made it up).
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News