- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Member when The Left wanted Obama to investigate Bush
Posted on 1/1/17 at 11:49 am to udtiger
Posted on 1/1/17 at 11:49 am to udtiger
quote:He received authorization for use of force from Congress by presenting false testimony. That led directly to the deaths of millions. If an investigation was done it likely could have uncovered tons of documentation on their intent. It is obvious to everyone that they were looking for an excuse to invade.
Actually...
Based on the repeated violations of the No Fly zones, as well as the refusal to comply with previous SC resolutions stemming from the First Gulf War, GWB already had the legal basis to attack Iraq.
Of course there is the case of destruction of government records where the number of counts should be on the order of 20 million.
Then there is the torture issue.
Perhaps we could have issued subpoenas for documents and e-mails related to the financial crisis and bailout.
This post was edited on 1/1/17 at 11:50 am
3
Posted on 1/1/17 at 11:52 am to mmcgrath
Ah yes...the moron was such a Svengali he was able to convince Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Madeline Albright and a shitton of Dem Congressional leaders of Iraq's WMD program BEFORE he was elected President.
This post was edited on 1/1/17 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 1/1/17 at 11:53 am to mmcgrath
Pure speculation. I have yet to be presented with a statute, elements, and evidence the elements were meant. I suspect there is a good reason for that.
If I used "likely would have shown" as evidence for Hillarys guilt you would be apoplectic. Not a surprise. I prefer not to deal with hypotheticals, speculation, and conjecture.
If I used "likely would have shown" as evidence for Hillarys guilt you would be apoplectic. Not a surprise. I prefer not to deal with hypotheticals, speculation, and conjecture.
This post was edited on 1/1/17 at 11:54 am
Posted on 1/1/17 at 12:43 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
He received authorization for use of force from Congress by presenting false testimony. That led directly to the deaths of million
This is just bullshite...and I suspect you know its bullshite.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News