Started By
Message

re: Michigan court rules okay for police to kill your dog

Posted on 12/25/16 at 10:41 am to
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 12/25/16 at 10:41 am to
Is your son on his agency's tac team serving high risk warrants?

There is a link in the story to the actual court ruling. Page 15 3rd paragraph down. ;-)

ETA from the opinion:

At the hearing, the district court held that, even if it did take the facts in the light most
favorable to Plaintiffs, the unrebutted fact that Officer Klein said the large brown pit bull lunged
at him before he shot her would still establish that his actions were reasonable. (R. 72 at 24, 45.)
A jury could reasonably conclude that a 97-pound pit bull, barking and lunging at the officers as
they breached the entryway, posed a threat to the officers’ safety and it was necessary to shoot
the dog in order for them to safely sweep the residence and insure that there were no other gang
members in the residence and that evidence was not being destroyed.



For what it is worth, I agree with your son. Most dogs I have dealt with in everyday interactions are very agreeable. The circumstances are the key issue. This case was decided by summary judgment which means the plaintiff submitted no evidence that a jury could find to show that the officers acted unreasonably.
This post was edited on 12/25/16 at 8:32 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112721 posts
Posted on 12/25/16 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Is your son on his agency's tac team serving high risk warrants?


He works narcotics. It's pretty dangerous.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram