Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 11/11/16 at 10:43 am to
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 11/11/16 at 10:43 am to
Voter turnout in countless areas would change without the EC. We have no idea who would have won if it was a straight popular vote.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83671 posts
Posted on 11/11/16 at 10:47 am to
quote:

We have no idea who would have won if it was a straight popular vote.


yeah it completely changes the dynamics

I could see it going either way, honestly
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/11/16 at 10:51 am to
quote:

We have no idea who would have won if it was a straight popular vote
that's what i'm saying. The common thought by everyone (including dems which is why they want it) is that they'd win every single election

i'm not convinced of that. I don't know how it would go, but I suspect that like you said, it could go either way and generally speaking the macro results would be pretty much the same...but i'm just saying it's a possibility. We don't use it for many reasons, many really fricking good reasons.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35252 posts
Posted on 11/11/16 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Voter turnout in countless areas would change without the EC. We have no idea who would have won if it was a straight popular vote.
True, but since there were more (or at least believed to be more) battleground states this year, this would probably be closer to the popular vote outcome than in most recent elections.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram