- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Chris Petersen article on choosing UW instead of USC
Posted on 11/10/16 at 11:14 am
Posted on 11/10/16 at 11:14 am
quote:
Negotiations were under way between USC and Petersen, and according to a source, general financial terms were agreed upon, but Petersen would not formally interview with Haden until after the regular season -- on Sunday, Dec. 1, in a Boise hotel.
It didn't go well, for Haden or for Petersen. The source compared it to a "bad date." Haden turned down an interview request, as did his top lieutenant, J.K. McKay, so the reported differences in that lengthy interview typically fall into a range between speculation and rumor.
Another source explained it like this: “I think it was a mutual idea that it might not have been a good fit. ... There were some things about the job that didn’t excite him too much, and there were things he said about how he viewed things that didn’t excite them.”
Petersen said it was clear during the conversation that he wasn't "the right fit" for Haden's vision of what USC's coach needed to be and do, and vice versa.
Whether because of Petersen not aggressively selling himself for the job, the L.A. lifestyle, the media demands, Haden's management style or concerns about whether Petersen's coaching and recruiting would translate from Boise State to the Pac-12, Petersen withdrew his USC candidacy. Shortly after the meeting, word leaked that USC was going to tap Sarkisian, a hiring that generated a lukewarm response from the Trojans' fan base.
LINK
Pat Haden
Take your sweet time with this LSU, you don't want to end up with a Clay or Sark.
Posted on 11/10/16 at 11:23 am to RLDSC FAN
Petersen wanted nothing to do with that dumpster fire or the moron Pat Haden.
Posted on 11/10/16 at 11:31 am to Rhio
quote:
moron Pat Haden.
Oh, I agree. This ticked me off...
quote:
If there was an apparent difference between Petersen's interview with Haden and what went down with Woodward, it's that Woodward made the discussion a recruitment instead of a probing.
“You know how I manage," he said. "It was an easy conversation. The head football coach is in charge. I’m here to make his job easy and good so we can have a great product. He is the CEO of that organization."
Posted on 11/10/16 at 12:01 pm to usc6158
If USC had elected to keep Coach O instead of hiring Sark (or a bigger name), how would USC fans have reacted? Just curious how he was viewed there.
Posted on 11/10/16 at 12:04 pm to mattz1122
He was very popular, most fans would've been ok with it. They were also ok with getting someone else, it was the hiring of Sark that shocked everyone. I personally thought (and still do) it should've been Jack Del Rio.
Posted on 11/10/16 at 12:08 pm to RLDSC FAN
So retain O, Pendergast and bring in a big name OC (or maybe keep Helton/Martin)? Wouldn't have been bad. Basically history has repeated itself at LSU.
This post was edited on 11/10/16 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 11/10/16 at 12:14 pm to RLDSC FAN
I wanted him at lsu years ago
Posted on 11/10/16 at 3:59 pm to RLDSC FAN
There is a very good chance that will be on a Gameday sign on Saturday 
Popular
Back to top
5





