Started By
Message

re: Is this the reality (Dodd article)?

Posted on 9/28/16 at 5:02 pm to
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
8541 posts
Posted on 9/28/16 at 5:02 pm to
Before 2000, you are correct. This program made the improvements, facilities, money, etc. to become a 10 win/year program.
Posted by SBC
Member since Oct 2005
6870 posts
Posted on 9/28/16 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

Before 2000, you are correct. This program made the improvements, facilities, money, etc. to become a 10 win/year program.


That's a dumb argument. It's all relative. Everyone else has similarly invested in the last 15 years.
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
24185 posts
Posted on 9/28/16 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

Before 2000, you are correct. This program made the improvements, facilities, money, etc. to become a 10 win/year program.


Also, let's not forget that much of the history of college football consists of a time of 11 games or less per year, much fewer bowl games (invites actually meant something), and no conference title games. All of that equals up to those 7-9 wins per year being comparable to or greater than winning 10-11 games per year this day and age.

I'd like to see the other numbers of central tendency (median and mode) concerning wins as well. Would make for a better judgement.

Edit to add: By this logic, we should expect Nebraska to become a national power again soon. I'm sure some others could be expected to rise to the top too, maybe Army?
This post was edited on 9/28/16 at 5:23 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram