- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Storm Tracking Thread: Post Tropical Storm Hermine
Posted on 8/26/16 at 12:06 pm to lsuman25
Posted on 8/26/16 at 12:06 pm to lsuman25
From another site:
How do you professionals feel about this statement and the chances that the GFS and Euro are actually getting this right?
quote:
The difference between the GFS / Euro track up coast of Florida and the Canadian / UKMET track is an upper level low that's supposed to move in near the Carolinas. The GFS / Euro have 99L being dragged northward by this ULL, the UKMET and CMC do not interact with it at all. Considering the consistency of the GFS on this track and intensity (and the Euro's general agreement on track) it makes sense to bet on a more eastward track.
How do you professionals feel about this statement and the chances that the GFS and Euro are actually getting this right?
Posted on 8/26/16 at 12:10 pm to medtiger
Right now i am sure that is the preferred track as of now but still there are alot of variables at play here. The high could be stronger or the ULL can be weaker or it can be the opposite time will tell.
Posted on 8/26/16 at 12:59 pm to medtiger
quote:
From another site:
quote:
The difference between the GFS / Euro track up coast of Florida and the Canadian / UKMET track is an upper level low that's supposed to move in near the Carolinas. The GFS / Euro have 99L being dragged northward by this ULL, the UKMET and CMC do not interact with it at all. Considering the consistency of the GFS on this track and intensity (and the Euro's general agreement on track) it makes sense to bet on a more eastward track.
How do you feel about this statement and the chances that the GFS and Euro are actually getting this right?
I posted this image earlier this morning concerning this:
It doesn't show up in the freely available data but the ULL in question originates from an upper through off the NE. It then drifts to the SW and ends up over Coastal Carolina. That process helps to develop a weakness in the ridge - red circle. I've mentioned before that the upper level setup for this period is very complicated and the models still struggle with the movement and strength of upper level features.
Bay also chimed in and mentioned that a center relocation or consolidation of the NE of what the models are showing could also get the system into that area.
Posted on 8/26/16 at 12:59 pm to medtiger
Deleted - Double post
This post was edited on 8/26/16 at 1:00 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News