Started By
Message

re: do you think it's possible to win a war without putting boots on the ground

Posted on 8/4/16 at 9:57 pm to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64987 posts
Posted on 8/4/16 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

Well in nam. Had we dropped an a bomb on Hanoi. I say they give up.




They did give up. Go read up on the Paris Peace Accords of 1973.

Two things made them give up.

1. Renewed heavy and sustained bombing of the North. Go read up on Operation Linebacker. This strategic bombing offensive devastated the North's ability to sustain their armies in the south and totally decimated the North's air defense.

2. The failure of the Easter Offensive against South Vietnam. The failure of this offensive proved the ARVN could defeat the NVA in a conventional campaign. The North was left unable to launch any major offensive operations following the abysmal failure of the Tet Offensive in 1968. Tet, in addition to completely Destroying the Viet Cong as an effective combat force, also left the NVA decimated to the point it took almost 4 years for them to rebuild enough of a force to once again go on the offensive. The failure of this new offensive in 1972, coupled with the bombing of the north which had totally destroyed by mid 72 the once formidable NVA air defenses made it clear to the North they could not win the war. Thus, they were left no other option that to agree to end the war.
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
15383 posts
Posted on 8/5/16 at 7:56 am to
So then why did we leave under fire? Genuine question. I'm not trying to be a dick. My dad was over there in 69. He has nothing good to say about it overall.
Posted by Sal Minella
Member since Nov 2006
1951 posts
Posted on 8/5/16 at 10:36 am to
quote:

They did give up


So how does the fact that 2.5 years later, in violation of Article 9 of the Peace Accords, the Democratic Republic of Vietnam achieved it's goal by taking over the entire territory as a communist regime indicate that they "gave up"? I mean Saigon is Ho Chi Minh City, for God's sake.

ETA: I posted before seeing your timeline reply. I'd disagree with your assessment of post-73 being "a whole new war" especially in the eyes of the North.
This post was edited on 8/5/16 at 10:38 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram