- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 1989 Football revisited
Posted on 7/28/16 at 1:02 pm to rpg37
Posted on 7/28/16 at 1:02 pm to rpg37
quote:
Should Archer have been kept longer in your opinion?
yes. I don't think he would have lasted but he should have be given another year IMO.
quote:
Imagine had we gotten Spurrier like we could have
he was rather unknown at the time and it never got close to him being hired.
Im not saying Archer was some great coach who would have been here forever, no. But I think he would have done better than Curley did.
Just gets crapped on by LSU fans for really no reason.
1
Posted on 7/28/16 at 1:08 pm to danfraz
quote:
Just gets crapped on by LSU fans for really no reason.
Are you serious? Were you even alive when Archer was hired? I was. I was at LSU all 4 years he was HC. I saw the Decline in real-time. The talent gap was noticeably worse every year. Bobby Bowden used to show recruits a video of Archer when asking them if they could really go play for that guy, meaning the moribund speaker who had no charisma.
Archer was the Program Devastator, as we began to call him, even while watching Curley ineptly take the helm and continue the struggle of the program. Curley's problem wasn't recruiting, it was everything else.
This post was edited on 7/28/16 at 1:09 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News