Started By
Message

re: We were 10-3 next year with Mcneese being played...Reasons we easily better that

Posted on 7/21/16 at 4:52 pm to
Posted by raw dog
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2011
483 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 4:52 pm to
You can't just assume a W vs. McNeese
Posted by TrumpTiger
Lake Charles
Member since Jun 2016
217 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 4:53 pm to
haha
Posted by Tigers_Saints
Member since Jun 2016
949 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

You can't just assume a W vs. McNeese

Posted by OKTiger83
Norman, OK
Member since Feb 2013
3133 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

You can't just assume a W vs. McNeese


Are you shitting us?

It is 99.98% absolute that you could assume that LF would've had 200 yards and we would have won by 30.

BTW, if not being serious then I should have my sarcasm meter recalibrated.
This post was edited on 7/21/16 at 6:19 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram