quote:
both are pretty overpriced, much like the Nemo.

SR25 is living on name at this point. the civilian pricing is an utter joke. they used to be the only good AR10 out and charge a hefty premium due to their contracts. id like to have one, but id never pay that much for one.

You're joking right?

The cost of R&D to develop and refine the SR-25 is passed on to the end user.

The latest iteration of the SR-25 (APC, ACC, etc,) is lightyears ahead of its "competitors".

As I always say, "It's your money; do as you please".

This post was edited on 7/20/16 at 12:09 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Carson123987

Middle Court at the Rec

Member since Jul 2011

66523 posts

Posted on 7/20/16 at 12:18 pm to rungunz

quote:
The cost of R&D to develop and refine the SR-25 is passed on to the end user.

quote:
The latest iteration of the SR-25 (APC, ACC, etc,) is lightyears ahead of its "competitors".

As I always say, "It's your money; do as you please".

no it's not. I could put together a rifle that shoots with similar accuracy for half the price. you're quoting pedigree (AKA name recognition), R&D (to justify the high price), and military contracts (just lol). those military contracts are why it's so fricking expensive. the price of an SR25 shouldn't exceed $2800-$3000 for what you get.

Why would you drop $5000 on an APC when you could spend $3000 on a rifle that's put together by GA Precision?

What components of the KAC are so much better than those of other quality AR-10s out right now? Don't just say "R&D"

Hell, I would take the MWS 100x over the SR25 at their respective prices

This post was edited on 7/20/16 at 12:27 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Outdoor Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board