- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Review on these ARs
Posted on 7/20/16 at 12:01 pm to rungunz
Posted on 7/20/16 at 12:01 pm to rungunz
quote:
Why would you buy that over an LMT MWS or KAC SR25?
both are pretty overpriced, much like the Nemo.
SR25 is living on name at this point. the civilian pricing is an utter joke. they used to be the only good AR10 out and charge a hefty premium due to their contracts. id like to have one, but id never pay that much for one.
Posted on 7/20/16 at 12:06 pm to Carson123987
quote:
both are pretty overpriced, much like the Nemo.
SR25 is living on name at this point. the civilian pricing is an utter joke. they used to be the only good AR10 out and charge a hefty premium due to their contracts. id like to have one, but id never pay that much for one.
You're joking right?
The cost of R&D to develop and refine the SR-25 is passed on to the end user.
The latest iteration of the SR-25 (APC, ACC, etc,) is lightyears ahead of its "competitors".
As I always say, "It's your money; do as you please".
This post was edited on 7/20/16 at 12:09 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)