- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/17/16 at 12:31 pm to UKWildcatsFAN
quote:
frick equality, I don't want my little girl being drafted to fight for politicians trumped up conflicts.
Then when she turns 18 she shouldn't be allowed to vote for a politician that might send my son to war.
This post was edited on 6/17/16 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 6/17/16 at 12:32 pm to lsunurse
You are ignoring the first rule for any message board... READ IT. I hope as a nurse you do more than read the first line on things.
Posted on 6/17/16 at 12:38 pm to SpqrTiger
Can you imagine this on the front lines?
Posted on 6/17/16 at 12:42 pm to tiger81
I'm not for women in combat roles but since they can enlist in those slots then shite make register for selective service.
frick it make them be "light infantry" and have them carry a near 100 lb ruck sack for 12 miles
frick it make them be "light infantry" and have them carry a near 100 lb ruck sack for 12 miles
Posted on 6/17/16 at 12:46 pm to tiger81
quote:
LIAR! You lose.
Hmmm
quote:
9. DO choose a subject line that accurately describes the content of your post. Do not use deceptive subjects to attract attention to your post. Do not use one or two-word subjects that provide no description. And do not post in ALL CAPS.
Also, you may want to further reference the other writings of Chicken: LINK
quote:
Important: Don't force readers to have to click the thread to know what it is about.
Here are some of the main reasons for anchored threads:
1. The subject of the thread is too short and not descriptive enough. We often see users just put one word or sometimes two words. Even 3-4 words can be too short. These are immediately anchored. Again, be descriptive. The subject should contain the point of your thread.
2. The subject of the thread is cut off. This is a problem that has been popping up a lot lately. A user will post a subject such as: "The key to winning the game is..." or "I am about to get torn to shreds but I think that" For whatever reasons, the user cut the subject off and is requiring that the reader click on the thread to find out what the point of the thread is. We would rather the main idea of the thread to be inside the subject.
Posted on 6/17/16 at 12:50 pm to dgnx6
quote:
I don't want my little girl being drafted to fight for politicians trumped up conflicts.
but for your son its fine?
make pay good enough to support a wife and two kids on E-5 salary and retirement in 10 years at 40% and 100% of state college tuition credits as long as making progress toward a degree, and 15 years at 80%.
the poor will volunteer.
Posted on 6/17/16 at 1:05 pm to Bmath
CLUELESS. My response was to your previous post where you lied about my question on purpose because you're a LIAR!
P.S. First rule of EVERY message board... READ IT!
Your attempts to cover your laziness isn't working.
P.S. First rule of EVERY message board... READ IT!
Your attempts to cover your laziness isn't working.
Posted on 6/17/16 at 1:10 pm to tiger81
quote:
P.S. First rule of EVERY message board... READ IT!
1. DO choose your user name carefully when you first register. Search the Member List to check for names that are similar to yours.
Posted on 6/17/16 at 1:13 pm to tiger81
I'm still confused why women are allowed in the military. They cause nothing but problems.
Posted on 6/17/16 at 1:15 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
I'm still confused why women are allowed in the military. They cause nothing but problems.
Read up on Grace Murray Hopper.
Posted on 6/17/16 at 1:25 pm to Bmath
I know why you skip the universal first rule of EVERY message board, because you obviously don't follow it. The funniest part of all this is my first response to you was "I think the two of you missed the message". I was saying that figuratively, but it turn out I was LITERALLY correct. You didn't read the message! LAZINESS!!
Posted on 6/17/16 at 1:45 pm to tiger81
quote:
You didn't read the message!
Again
Important: Don't force readers to have to click the thread to know what it is about.
That is from Chicken.
You keep trying to argue that it is my fault for not reading thoroughly. I already admitted that I didn't notice the rest of your question because you used a hanging title. I clarified my answer and pointed out that you should update your thread title to make everything clearer.
I have provided several examples from the guidelines and from Chicken as to why it is your responsibility to carefully ard correctly write your title.
Your refusal to change the thread title to OT ladies and parents, how do you feel about being drafted for combat is "laziness."
Also, you called me a liar for some unknown reason. I'm not sure how you don't understand that asking someone what they feel is the same thing as asking for their opinion.
We've now completely gone off topic. I've made my point. Good day.
Posted on 6/17/16 at 4:58 pm to Bmath
quote:
Read up on Grace Murray Hopper.
For every one of her I could link 10000 males who did even more remarkable deeds. And for everyone of her there are thousands of female soldiers who's very presence, whether it's their fault or not, cause more trouble than their presence is worth.
Posted on 6/17/16 at 7:15 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
I could link 10000 males
Hyperbole much? I'll gladly wait for you to complete that list and post it here.
I'm not arguing that men typically are not more useful in the military. However, to act like all women have no value in any role is utterly small minded.
Posted on 6/17/16 at 7:18 pm to tiger81
pc bullshite to weaken the military by naive assholes who can't fathom that it will be needed at some point in the future
Posted on 6/17/16 at 7:41 pm to Bmath
quote:
Hyperbole much? I'll gladly wait for you to complete that list and post it here.
I mean, over the entire recorded history of warfare I'm pretty sure I could find 10000 males that equal her accomplishments. She'd barely be a footnote if it weren't for her gender.
quote:
However, to act like all women have no value in any role is utterly small minded.
I didn't say some women didn't add value to the military, but it wasn't because they were female. Just like not all males are valuable to the military. I said that the presence of females in general make the military worse.
Posted on 6/17/16 at 7:52 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
I mean, over the entire recorded history of warfare I'm pretty sure I could find 10000 males that equal her accomplishments. She'd barely be a footnote if it weren't for her gender.
That was never the point of my post, but I'm still waiting on your list.
quote:
I said that the presence of females in general make the military worse.
That's a very sad point of view. The military is so much more than grunts in fox hole.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News