I'm sure you're not the only one that will prefer Batman vs. Superman over Civil War, but for me Batman versus Superman was entirely too flawed. It was horrible pacing, a lot of it made no sense, it felt entirely to rushed to try and catch up with Marvel, Lois Lane served no purpose, Martha, the cave troll ninja turtle hybrid, and no real reason why Lex Luthor hated Superman. At least in Civil War we know why Baron Zemo did what he did. The action was incredibly well done. The CGI didn't look cheesy at all. It's also quite an amazing feat to be able to juggle 12 to 15 characters in one movie when Batman vs. Superman could barely juggle 3. Give me Civil War any day of the week, but to each his own.

This post was edited on 5/12/16 at 9:45 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by cincyykid

in a swamp far far away

Member since Mar 2016

1302 posts

Posted on 5/12/16 at 9:55 am to Ibleedblackandgold

I just think, like someone else said earlier in this thread, that a lot of the stuff that bvs is raked over the cos for marvel gets a pass. Yes marvel did a pretty good job juggling characters and the motive was a little better but it seemed like every superhero who should win on paper gets there arse handed to them because plot.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by OMLandshark

Member since Apr 2009

109633 posts

Posted on 5/12/16 at 11:16 am to Ibleedblackandgold

quote:
At least in Civil War we know why Baron Zemo did what he did.

Watching the movie I couldn't help but think they accidentally placed Lex into Civil War. That's closer to Lex Luthor than we've gotten in any live action interpretation of him. They should have kept it simple like CW did and just have Lex pissed at Superman for ruining his city. I thought Zemo was great in this, and for once the bad guy won.

0 ...

Report Post

Movie/TV Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board