Started By
Message

re: Per Bloomberg: Halliburton and Baker Hughes deal is OFF

Posted on 5/2/16 at 6:54 am to
Posted by KG6
Member since Aug 2009
10920 posts
Posted on 5/2/16 at 6:54 am to
It's not necessarily a "market share" issue, more of a company valuation issue. Baker Hughes took a ~30% hit in stock value since this started as opposed to Halliburton at half that (15%). This has left Baker de-valued big time. It may very well put Halliburton in the same position in the near future, but from the start, this leaves Baker weaker.

Only saving grace for Hal may be that people view it as cutting their losses and that losing 3.5B is better than taking on a company paying 78 bucks a share when it's now only worth 46. But it still is a very bad situation. I think Baker and Hal are both going to be getting some new CEO's in the next few months. What a waste of money for both companies at such a difficult time for the industry.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59615 posts
Posted on 5/2/16 at 7:58 am to
quote:

I think Baker and Hal are both going to be getting some new CEO's in the next few months

it won't be months.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram