Started By
Message

re: New Orleans monument removal question

Posted on 4/29/16 at 11:00 am to
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9478 posts
Posted on 4/29/16 at 11:00 am to
It maybe the history buff in me but if they fixed the inscription, I don't see the problem with the monument being there.
-----------------------------------------------------------
As a "history buff", I'd think you'd want the original inscription to remain intact. After all, that was the popular sentiment at that point in history.




It's still a significant enough event that shows that Reconstruction did not go as smoothly as everyone would think and how different of a state it was, even after the civil war. It should be marked in some way.
----------------------------------------------------------
Does anyone, even "non- history buffs", actually think Reconstruction went smoothly? It was a clusterfrick, which yielded actions like the Liberty Place riots.

As far as how different things were and remembering our past history goes, there's a USSC case that serves that purpose. Surely, as a history buff, you're familiar with Plessy v. Ferguson.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram