- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Where do the Warriors fit historically if they win the title this year
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:03 pm to mattz1122
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:03 pm to mattz1122
quote:no its not
Chalk this up as an ADD/prisoner-of-the-moment thread.
When you look at the Warriors franchise resume, it's surprising how well it actually compares to other franchises. People act like the bulls, or the sixers, or the Pistons have been this consistent winner throughout all of the NBA but that couldn't be further from the truth. There have only been three consistent winners in the NBAs history and that's the lakers, celtics, and the spurs. After that, it's pretty debatable
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:04 pm to WestCoastAg
My bad, they are 20 in win percentage. Still bad
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:05 pm to WestCoastAg
How consistent have the Warriors been throughout NBA history? They were basically the Clippers a few short years ago.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:05 pm to 13SaintTiger
The pistons are 19th in winning percentage
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:07 pm to mattz1122
About as consistent as the bulls and the Pistons and the sixers. The bulls history is absolutely propped up by the ridiculousness of MJ and who knows, the Warriors may be about to go on that same level of run
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:07 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
After that, it's pretty debatable
No it isn't. The Warriors have won one championship in 45 years. That's bad, real bad. They've also been in the league longer than majority of other franchises, their last NBA championship before last year was before multiple franchises came about. What a pathetic thread.
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:07 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
Warriors may be about to go on that same level of run
Well until then stfu about them being a top 5 franchise, because they aren't
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:08 pm to WestCoastAg
I'd say a top 10 franchise, not a top 5 franchise.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:08 pm to 13SaintTiger
Where did I say they were?
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:13 pm to WestCoastAg
Except the Warriors have never come close to winning 6 titles in 8 years, so there's that.
Also the Warriors have a 47% winning percentage, which is in the bottom half of the NBA.
Also the Warriors have a 47% winning percentage, which is in the bottom half of the NBA.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:17 pm to mattz1122
Warriors have a winning percentage that's .7% higher than the AMAZIN New Orleans Pelicans
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:18 pm to mattz1122
WestCoastAg, you're a smart guy. I like you. But come on, man!!!!!
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:20 pm to mattz1122
quote:as of now? sure. but i think there should be something said about a franchise who hasnt been able to get more than one championship group going. the bulls have a higher place than the warriors do right now but i dont think thats going to last for much longer
Except the Warriors have never come close to winning 6 titles in 8 years, so there's that.
quote:their winning percentage is whats holding them back. but its not like other franchise that people like to throw around, like the pistons and the sixers, have great winning percentages either. the pistons are 19th in winning percentage, the sixers are 11th
Also the Warriors have a 47% winning percentage, which is in the bottom half of the NBA.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:20 pm to mattz1122
im just playing devils advocate to make this thread go
as i already said i dont have them as a top 5 franchise but i do think they have about an equal argument as some other franchises do
as i already said i dont have them as a top 5 franchise but i do think they have about an equal argument as some other franchises do
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 6:22 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:22 pm to sicboy
quote:
One of those 5...
Has only been in the league for 28 years, have the 9th best winning percentage and have made it to the finals 5 times (won 3).......once again in 28 years. Not to shabby
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:25 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
like the pistons
They've been to the finals 7 times in the past 30 years. Stahp plz
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:26 pm to 13SaintTiger
i thought being 20th in winning percentage was shitty. is 19th that much better?
the pistons entered the league in 1949, they played in 2 finals between then and 1988. they played in 5 NBA finals between 1949 and 2003
the pistons entered the league in 1949, they played in 2 finals between then and 1988. they played in 5 NBA finals between 1949 and 2003
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 6:30 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:28 pm to 13SaintTiger
quote:
At any rate it's debatable on who you would replace Miami with. Maybe Detroit, philly, or the Knicks
I can agree with this......
Posted on 4/15/16 at 6:33 pm to dukke v
quote:two NBA finals appearances since 1974
Knicks
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News