Started By
Message

re: Spinoff: Was Pelelieu the Biggest Waste of a Campaign in WWII?

Posted on 3/16/16 at 10:57 am to
Posted by The Eric
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
21084 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 10:57 am to
You are only looking at it from an offensive standpoint.

I too was not alive nor am I a military strategist, but by holding the area it prevented the enemy from having and utilizing it.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
65144 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 11:04 am to
quote:

You are only looking at it from an offensive standpoint.

I too was not alive nor am I a military strategist, but by holding the area it prevented the enemy from having and utilizing it.




We didn't actually have to take Pelelieu. We could have simply by-passed and isolated it like we did with numerous other Japanese held islands.

But of course as has already been pointed out in this thread, we're looking at this matter with the benefit of hindsight.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram