- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Homeowner for the win
Posted on 3/14/16 at 12:29 am to TigernMS12
Posted on 3/14/16 at 12:29 am to TigernMS12
quote:
Do you not read? My argument is simply that you cannot use deadly force as means to protect solely property.
And you are fricking wrong. There are such cases and your argument is moot because of them.
quote:
Subsection 2 clearly only applies to "prevent the imminent commission."
Case history says otherwise. Wrong again.
Your whole argument stemmed from your poor understanding of this situation and the law in Florida (otherwise you would not have quoted Mississippi laws). You don't have an argument here, this lady did the right thing and there are clearly places and situations where one can use lethal force to protect property.
2
Posted on 3/14/16 at 12:31 am to Clames
Clames putting in work tonight on y'all! Posted on 3/14/16 at 12:38 am to Clames
quote:
Clames
quote:
My argument is simply that you cannot use deadly force as means to protect solely property.
quote:
Florida does not recognize a right to use deadly force in the protection of property interests alone.
How does this not make sense?
This post was edited on 3/14/16 at 12:41 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News