- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Homeowner for the win
Posted on 3/13/16 at 11:16 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 3/13/16 at 11:16 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You claimed you cannot defend property with deadly force. You're wrong. There are varying circumstances from place to place but yes, you can defend property with deadly force. I'm not sure this case was one of those times.
The only time you can defend property with deadly force is if you are invoking the castle doctrine, which is not applicable here, so I didn't not consider that in your response. Yes, that is a small exception to general rule. The prosecutor doesn't have to prosecute any case, but he could in this case if he wanted to based upon manslaughter. This is based on the report of course. Whatever happened in that "confrontation" could have changed it to a self-defense situation.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)