quote:
And f@ck using a 1st on Treadwell.

The ONLY way I see him as a Saint is we can't trade down and every player we had way higher than Treadwell is gone and he's just a BPA pick up.

I don't see them taking him, but I don't get why people seem to think he wouldn't be great in the B&G or worth the pick. I know we need D but that doesn't mean we don't need a WR either. I would be ecstatic with Buckner in the 1st and Doctson in the 2nd.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by goatmilker

Castle Anthrax

Member since Feb 2009

64679 posts

Posted on 2/13/16 at 3:23 pm to Sho Nuff

He would be great. Just other positions as in many I would rather draft.

We must put more pressure on the QB than on the opposing defenses.

FA pass rushers are top dollar guys in the market so our best chance on the cheap is through the draft. So taking a WR no matter how good which he is is a luxury we can't afford right now.

This post was edited on 2/13/16 at 3:26 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by hugo_boss

Baton Rouge

Member since Oct 2012

990 posts

Posted on 2/13/16 at 4:53 pm to Sho Nuff

quote:

I don't see them taking him, but I don't get why people seem to think he wouldn't be great in the B&G or worth the pick. I know we need D but that doesn't mean we don't need a WR either. I would be ecstatic with Buckner in the 1st and Doctson in the 2nd.

I agree that we need a WR but when your defense is putting up historically bad stats in consecutive seasons, how do you justify fixing that problem not being priority #1? I saw someone say this draft is strong on the DL and we could wait to get a "stud" in round 2. I look at it as a chance to double dip and get 2 "stud" d lineman. Seattle rode a dominant defense to two straight Superbowls and Denver just won one where their offense never got off the bus. Now I'm not saying either defense is easy to put together or emulate but we have to put forth the effort.

1 ...

Report Post

Saints Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board