- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will the Angels think about trading Mike Trout and what would it take?
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:57 pm to WestCoastAg
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:57 pm to WestCoastAg
The Cubs are probably the only ones who I think could offer what would be deemed as fair with all the young ML talent they have plus prospects. Maybe the Dodgers
But if you're the Cubs, why blow up your young homegrown core for one player? Even if it is the best player on the planet I don't know that it gets you closer to a championship plus all the chemistry factors
But if you're the Cubs, why blow up your young homegrown core for one player? Even if it is the best player on the planet I don't know that it gets you closer to a championship plus all the chemistry factors
This post was edited on 2/11/16 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 2/11/16 at 4:58 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Problem with the Dodgers is we don't have great, cost controlled, talent. Once you get past puig you are looking at pederson and seager who are still question marks on what their value is
This post was edited on 2/11/16 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 2/11/16 at 5:02 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Cubs dont have what LA Angels need, Young stud pitching.
0 top100 prospect at pitching.
0 top100 prospect at pitching.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News