Started By
Message

re: Gating canals in houma area

Posted on 2/19/16 at 9:40 pm to
Posted by man in the stadium
Member since Aug 2006
1410 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 9:40 pm to
Cwppra is a separate program. It would only be by chance Cwppra paid for any maintenance of their land. I've never heard of such a requirement, but if there was one, every coastal landowner in the state would be in violation.
Posted by Capt ST
Hotel California
Member since Aug 2011
13045 posts
Posted on 2/20/16 at 3:13 am to
They are paying for the work not the Feds. Just not sure why they do it in this area vs the rest of the state: I'll find out why they are maintaining the shorelines in that area. I do know it was a sticking point in the long term lease negotiations. It might be done to maintain water levels on apaches Corp lease. And to keep the riff raff obviously. But that area is where they are forcing the freshwater into upper terrebonne marshes.

I actually hope they create some additional entry points for you criminals. All these restoration projects have ruined the duck hunting.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram