Started By
Message

re: Delgado for mayor

Posted on 1/7/16 at 3:36 pm to
Posted by terriblegreen
Souf Badden Rewage
Member since Aug 2011
10207 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

and they pay for that water just like you do to water your grass. But until something(person/group/study) proves it affects the salt in the aquifer, that's bullshite to demand these industries pay 1000% more taxes OR re-source your water to the MS river and pay for all the infrastructure and filters yourself.



It's shite like this I don't understand. We all need water. Why would anyone not want to preserve the aquifer for drinking? I'm pretty sure Exxon can afford it. But, you'd rather it become an issue for the City Parish. Ok.
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
47851 posts
Posted on 1/7/16 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

It's shite like this I don't understand. We all need water. Why would anyone not want to preserve the aquifer for drinking? I'm pretty sure Exxon can afford it. But, you'd rather it become an issue for the City Parish. Ok.


Not the big refinery. The smaller Exxon facilities north of BR along 61 and other small plants on 19. It's the arbitrary nature of the effort. Smokie's plan says "hey we think your using the water MAY affect salt water intrusion. Take your pipes out and tap the MS river. Oh and the bill is all yours."

It was the bullying nature of changing something and not meeting in the middle on the issue/costs.

Again there is NO evidence the water use is contributing to the intrusion. It's a THEORY.
This post was edited on 1/7/16 at 4:05 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram